- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs T60
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Wiko T60
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (10) and where T60 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display4.5
7.8Camera5.3
5.3Battery7.7
5.7Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GT60
| Galaxy A24 4G | T60 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 165.8 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.8 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.8 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 217 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than T60?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · T60: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · T60: No
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · T60: No
- Weight195 g vs 217 g+11%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 4.2+26%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9.8 mm+18%
Why is T60 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 24 MP+85%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 217 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.8 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Black, Purple, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT8788V/WA |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 24 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0