- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs Y27s
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Vivo Y27s
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (7) and where Y27s wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.4
7.8Camera4.6
5.3Battery6.5
5.7Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GY27s
| Galaxy A24 4G | Y27s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 164.1 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.2 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 192 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Y27s?
- OLED panelYes · Y27s: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y27s: No
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 650 nits+54%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y27s: No
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Y27s better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.4% vs 85.4%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Burgundy Black, Garden Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,388 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 85.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0


