- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs T2x (India)
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Vivo T2x (India)
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (10) and where T2x (India) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display4.5
7.8Camera4.6
5.3Battery4.6
5.7Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GT2x (India)
| Galaxy A24 4G | T2x (India) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 164.1 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.6 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 184 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than T2x (India)?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · T2x (India): No
- Optical stabilisationYes · T2x (India): No
- NFCYes · T2x (India): No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · T2x (India): No
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is T2x (India) better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- 5GNo · Galaxy A24 4G: Yes
- Weight195 g vs 184 g+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.4% vs 84.1%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Glimmer Black, Aurora Gold, Marine Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0