- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs Power Armor X11
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs UleFone Power Armor X11
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (20) and where Power Armor X11 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display2.8
7.8Camera3.1
5.3Battery9.3
5.7Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GPower Armor X11
| Galaxy A24 4G | Power Armor X11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 158.2 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 19.3 mm | −11 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 330 g | −135 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Power Armor X11?
- Main camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Power Armor X11: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Power Armor X11: No
- Weight195 g vs 330 g+69%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 19.3 mm2.3×
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 295 ppi+34%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Why is Power Armor X11 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 8,150 mAh+63%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 330 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 19.3 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 158.2 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 5.4″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,440 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 295 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 63.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 8,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0