- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs T909c
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Tel.Me. T909c
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (7) and where T909c wins (1) — every spec side by side.
7.0Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GT909c
| Galaxy A24 4G | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 129 mm | +33.1 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 44 mm | +33.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 18 mm | −9.7 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 80 g | +115 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than T909c?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 600 mAh8.3×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · T909c: No
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 18 mm2.2×
- Memory card slotYes · T909c: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909c: No
Why is T909c better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Weight195 g vs 80 g2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | — |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | — |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | — |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0