- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs 40 XL
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs TCL 40 XL
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (13) and where 40 XL wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.1
7.8Camera4.6
5.3Battery4.6
5.7Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4G40 XL
| Galaxy A24 4G | 40 XL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 167.9 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.5 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 195 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than 40 XL?
- OLED panelYes · 40 XL: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · 40 XL: No
- NFCYes · 40 XL: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 260 ppi+52%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · 40 XL: No
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.8 mm+6%
Why is 40 XL better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- eSIMNo · Galaxy A24 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.4% vs 85.6%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 167.9 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Dark Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 85.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0


