- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A17 4G vs T40
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G vs Wiko T40
What Galaxy A17 4G does better (14) and where T40 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display4.7
7.8Camera4.6
5.3Battery4.6
5.7Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A17 4GT40
| Galaxy A17 4G | T40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 164.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.3 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.8 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 183 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than T40?
- OLED panelYes · T40: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · T40: No
- NFCYes · T40: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 269 ppi+43%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · T40: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is T40 better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A17 4G: Yes
- Weight190 g vs 183 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 183 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Light blue | Sunrise Violet, Champagne Gold, Sky Mirror, Dark Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 83.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 526,972 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,052 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.37 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsSamsung Galaxy A55
7.08.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G
7.07.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsSamsung Galaxy A17
7.07.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsSamsung Galaxy A35
7.07.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsInfinix Hot 60 Pro+
7.07.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsXiaomi Redmi 15C
7.06.9


