- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C32 vs Galaxy A24 4G
Oukitel C32 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What C32 does better (1) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Display7.0
3.2Camera7.8
7.6Battery5.3
2.4Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
C32Galaxy A24 4G
| C32 | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.5 mm | 162.1 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 77.6 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 195 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C32 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Battery capacity5,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than C32?
- Main camera20 MP vs 50 MP2.5×
- Peak brightness440 nits vs 1,000 nits2.3×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · C32: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · C32: Yes
- NFCNo · C32: Yes
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 396 ppi+47%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+38%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · C32: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.5 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Blue, Purple, Black | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 440 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,150 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0