- dotrising.com
- Compare
- S80 vs Galaxy A24 4G
OSCAL S80 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What S80 does better (2) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display7.0
4.3Camera7.8
8.7Battery5.3
6.0Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
S80Galaxy A24 4G
| S80 | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 174 mm | 162.1 mm | +11.9 mm |
| Width | 81.4 mm | 77.6 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 18.9 mm | 8.3 mm | +10.6 mm |
| Weight | 460 g | 195 g | +265 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S80 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Battery capacity13,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.6×
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than S80?
- Main camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Weight460 g vs 195 g2.4×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · S80: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · S80: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Thickness18.9 mm vs 8.3 mm2.3×
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.6% vs 82.4%+12%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 460 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 18.9 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 174 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 81.4 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Navy Green, Mecha Orange, Conquest Black | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.6% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 13,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0