- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno16 F vs Camon 50 Pro
OPPO Reno16 F vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro
What Reno16 F does better (7) and where Camon 50 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display9.7
6.4Performance7.2
9.4Camera9.1
9.2Battery8.6
8.9Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno16 FCamon 50 Pro
| Reno16 F | Camon 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.2 mm | 162.4 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 77 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 175 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno16 F better than Camon 50 Pro?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+8%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
Why is Camon 50 Pro better than Reno16 F?
- AnTuTu score789,658 vs 1,059,715+34%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno16 F: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,891 vs 3,199+11%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight197 g vs 175 g+13%
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 429 ppi+8%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,208 px+12%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 7.8 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 175 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 158.2 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Crystal Guard | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Pop White, Twilight Violet, Dream Purple | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 89.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 789,658 | 1,059,715 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,891 | 3,199 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 75 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.19.1
vs
Xiaomi Poco X8 ProvsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.29.1
vs
Tecno Camon 50 ProvsInfinix Note 60 Pro
9.19.1
vs
Motorola Edge 70 FusionvsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.19.1
vs
Nothing Phone (4a) ProvsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.29.1
vs
Nothing Phone ProvsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.39.1


