- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno13 FS 5G vs Pova 7 Ultra
OPPO Reno13 FS 5G vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
What Reno13 FS 5G does better (11) and where Pova 7 Ultra wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display9.6
8.8Camera7.8
8.1Battery9.1
9.1Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno13 FS 5GPova 7 Ultra
| Reno13 FS 5G | Pova 7 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.2 mm | 160 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 201 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno13 FS 5G better than Pova 7 Ultra?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 7 Ultra: No
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 144 Hz+25%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight192 g vs 201 g+5%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.9 mm+14%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.2% vs 89.3%+3%
Why is Pova 7 Ultra better than Reno13 FS 5G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wireless chargingNo · Reno13 FS 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+52%
- Dual SIMNo · Reno13 FS 5G: Yes
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 460 ppi+17%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 162.2 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | — | Geek White, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.2% | 89.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,771,444 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,914 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | — | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 15 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
