- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Ace Pro vs Redmi K50 Gaming
OnePlus Ace Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
What Ace Pro does better (10) and where Redmi K50 Gaming wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.4
8.6Camera8.0
6.9Battery6.8
8.7Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ace ProRedmi K50 Gaming
| Ace Pro | Redmi K50 Gaming | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 162.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 76.7 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 204 g | 210 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ace Pro better than Redmi K50 Gaming?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi K50 Gaming: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Wired charging150 W vs 120 W+25%
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+2%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 800 nits+19%
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 3 GHz+6%
- Weight204 g vs 210 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi K50 Gaming better than Ace Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Moonstone Black, Jade Green, Genshin Impact | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Fluid AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 86.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 150 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 12.1 | MIUI 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPhone 14 Pro MaxvsOnePlus Ace Pro
8.68.6
vs
OnePlus Ace ProvsInfinix Zero Ultra
8.68.4
vs
OnePlus Ace ProvsMotorola Edge 30 Pro
8.68.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K50vsOnePlus Ace Pro
8.68.6
vs
Apple iPhone 14 Pro MaxvsXiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
8.68.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K50 GamingvsInfinix Zero Ultra
8.48.4