- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 3210 4G vs Cymbal U
Nokia 3210 4G vs ZTE Cymbal U
What 3210 4G does better (2) and where Cymbal U wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is 3210 4G better than Cymbal U?
- Dual SIMYes · Cymbal U: No
- Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
Why is Cymbal U better than 3210 4G?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,600 mAh+10%
- CPU frequency1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz+30%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 3210 4G: Yes
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Thickness | — | 19.5 mm |
| Height | — | 109.2 mm |
| Width | — | 55.9 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 39.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 28 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 308 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 8 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 8 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 720p |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Proprietary |
| Platform | — | Other |
