- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Hot 50 Pro 4G vs 3210 4G
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Nokia 3210 4G
What Hot 50 Pro 4G does better (9) and where 3210 4G wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Camera3.1
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than 3210 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh3.4×
- Main camera50 MP vs 2 MP25×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 2.4″2.8×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1 GHz2.2×
- OLED panelYes · 3210 4G: No
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 240 px4.5×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · 3210 4G: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/2.8+75%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is 3210 4G better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
3210 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | — |
| Height | 167 mm | — |
| Width | 76.4 mm | — |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 562,039 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,992 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 2 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/2.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.66.7
vs
Infinix Hot 60 ProvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
7.66.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.76.7
vs
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4GvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro
6.76.6