- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 3210 4G vs XP100
Nokia 3210 4G vs Sonim XP100
What 3210 4G does better (0) and where XP100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is 3210 4G better than XP100?
3210 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is XP100 better than 3210 4G?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,800 mAh+24%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 3210 4G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 165 g |
| Thickness | — | 16.2 mm |
| Height | — | 145 mm |
| Width | — | 62 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 19.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc T127 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | — | 1 |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.062 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,800 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Mocor OS |
| Platform | — | Other |
