- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 3210 4G vs 8210 4G
Nokia 3210 4G vs Nokia 8210 4G
What 3210 4G does better (1) and where 8210 4G wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is 3210 4G better than 8210 4G?
- Main camera2 MP vs 0.3 MP6.7×
Why is 8210 4G better than 3210 4G?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 3210 4G: Yes
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 107 g |
| Thickness | — | 13.8 mm |
| Height | — | 131.3 mm |
| Width | — | 56.2 mm |
| Colours | — | Sand, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 32.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | — | 22 nm |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.047 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.98 W/kg |
