How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 2360 Flip vs Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Nokia 2360 Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

What 2360 Flip does better (3) and where Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 2360 Flip
Nokia · 20262360 Flip
3 advantages
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
9.2Score
13 advantages≈ $1,900
Higher score
2.5Display8.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

2360 FlipGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
55.6 × 111.919143.2 × 158.44.1
2360 FlipGalaxy Z Fold8 UltraDifference
Height111.9 mm158.4 mm−46.5 mm
Width55.6 mm143.2 mm−87.6 mm
Thickness19 mm4.1 mm+14.9 mm
Weight121 g215 g−94 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 2360 Flip better than Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

  1. Weight121 g vs 215 g+78%
  2. Memory card slotYes · Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: No
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: No

Why is Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better than 2360 Flip?

  1. Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 5,000 mAh3.4×
  2. RAM0.004 GB vs 16 GB4,096×
  3. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  4. Screen size2.8″ vs 8″2.9×
  5. Pixel density143 ppi vs 422 ppi3×
  6. OLED panelNo · 2360 Flip: Yes
  7. NFCNo · 2360 Flip: Yes
  8. Stereo speakersNo · 2360 Flip: Yes
  9. Thickness19 mm vs 4.1 mm4.6×
  10. Resolution (width)240 px vs 2,256 px9.4×
  11. Screen-to-body ratio39% vs 90.1%2.3×
  12. eSIMNo · 2360 Flip: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight121 g215 g
Thickness19 mm4.1 mm
Height111.9 mm158.4 mm
Width55.6 mm143.2 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protection—IP48
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursBurgundy Red, Charcoal, TealGraphite, Cream, Violet Shadow
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size2.8″8″
PanelTFTFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelNoYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)240 px2,256 px
Resolution (height)320 px2,504 px
Pixel density143 ppi422 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,432 nits
Screen-to-body ratio39%90.1%
HDR—Yes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
Chipset—Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip maker—Qualcomm
Process—3 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—4.74 GHz
GPU—Adreno 840
AnTuTu score—2,160,310
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—11,124
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,772
Memory
RAM0.004 GB16 GB
Storage (max)—1,024 GB
Storage (base)—256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera—200 MP
Main camera aperture—f/1.7
Main sensor size—1/1.3"
Rear cameras—3
Optical stabilisation—Yes
Ultra-wide camera—Yes
Telephoto camera—Yes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video—8K
4K video frame rate—120 fps
Selfie camera—10 MP
4K selfie video—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity1,450 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonSi/C
Active use (test)—13.1 h
Wired charging—45 W
Charged in 30 min—67%
Wireless charging—Yes
Wireless charging power—20 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5G—Yes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—6
NFCNoYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output—Yes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Satellite navigation—GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-29.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor—Side
Barometer—Yes
Sensors—Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.82 W/kg
Software
OS at launch—Android 17
Platform—Android
Interface—One UI 9
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,200
Endurance per cycle—51 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare