How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 2360 Flip vs Galaxy Z Flip8

Nokia 2360 Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

What 2360 Flip does better (3) and where Galaxy Z Flip8 wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 2360 Flip
Nokia · 20262360 Flip
3 advantages
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Flip8
7.7Score
13 advantages≈ $900
Higher score
2.5Display6.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

2360 FlipGalaxy Z Flip8
55.6 × 111.91975.4 × 166.96.1
2360 FlipGalaxy Z Flip8Difference
Height111.9 mm166.9 mm−55 mm
Width55.6 mm75.4 mm−19.8 mm
Thickness19 mm6.1 mm+12.9 mm
Weight121 g180 g−59 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 2360 Flip better than Galaxy Z Flip8?

  1. Weight121 g vs 180 g+49%
  2. Memory card slotYes · Galaxy Z Flip8: No
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy Z Flip8: No

Why is Galaxy Z Flip8 better than 2360 Flip?

  1. Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 4,300 mAh3×
  2. RAM0.004 GB vs 12 GB3,072×
  3. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  4. Pixel density143 ppi vs 400 ppi2.8×
  5. Screen size2.8″ vs 6.9″2.5×
  6. OLED panelNo · 2360 Flip: Yes
  7. NFCNo · 2360 Flip: Yes
  8. Stereo speakersNo · 2360 Flip: Yes
  9. Thickness19 mm vs 6.1 mm3.1×
  10. Resolution (width)240 px vs 1,080 px4.5×
  11. Screen-to-body ratio39% vs 87.1%2.2×
  12. eSIMNo · 2360 Flip: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight121 g180 g
Thickness19 mm6.1 mm
Height111.9 mm166.9 mm
Width55.6 mm75.4 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protection—IP48
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
ColoursBurgundy Red, Charcoal, TealGraphite, Cream, Pink, Mint
Display
Screen size2.8″6.9″
PanelTFTFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelNoYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)240 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)320 px2,520 px
Pixel density143 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,470 nits
Screen-to-body ratio39%87.1%
HDR—Yes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
Chipset—Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CN
Chip maker—Qualcomm
Process—3 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—4.74 GHz
GPU—Adreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROW
AnTuTu score—1,821,743
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—10,466
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,916
Memory
RAM0.004 GB12 GB
Storage (max)—512 GB
Storage (base)—256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera—50 MP
Main camera aperture—f/1.8
Main sensor size—1/1.56"
Rear cameras—2
Optical stabilisation—Yes
Ultra-wide camera—Yes
Telephoto camera—No
Optical zoom—2×
Max video—4K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera—10 MP
4K selfie video—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity1,450 mAh4,300 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonSi/C
Active use (test)—14.2 h
Wired charging—25 W
Charged in 30 min—55%
Wireless charging—Yes
Wireless charging power—15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5G—Yes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCNoYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Satellite navigation—GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor—Side
Barometer—Yes
Sensors—Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.74 W/kg
Software
OS at launch—Android 17
Platform—Android
Interface—One UI 9
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,200
Endurance per cycle—44 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare