- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 230 (2024) vs 3210 4G
Nokia 230 (2024) vs Nokia 3210 4G
What 230 (2024) does better (2) and where 3210 4G wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Camera3.1
Why is 230 (2024) better than 3210 4G?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · 3210 4G: No
- Screen size2.8″ vs 2.4″+17%
Why is 3210 4G better than 230 (2024)?
3210 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Thickness | 10.9 mm | — |
| Height | 124.6 mm | — |
| Width | 53.4 mm | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Black, White | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 36.5% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc 6531F | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| CPU frequency | — | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.008 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Selfie camera | 2 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Nokia Series 30+ | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
| Interface | Series 30 | — |
