How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 215 4G (2024) vs 3210

Nokia 215 4G (2024) vs Nokia 3210

What 215 4G (2024) does better (3) and where 3210 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 215 4G (2024)
Nokia · 2024215 4G (2024)
3.5Score
3 advantages≈ $95
vs
Nokia 3210
Nokia · 20243210
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $75
Higher score
2.1Display2.1
2.1Battery2.1
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

215 4G (2024)3210
54.2 × 127.311.652 × 12213.1
215 4G (2024)3210Difference
Height127.3 mm122 mm+5.3 mm
Width54.2 mm52 mm+2.2 mm
Thickness11.6 mm13.1 mm−1.5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 215 4G (2024) better than 3210?

  1. Screen size2.8″ vs 2.4″+17%
  2. Screen-to-body ratio35.2% vs 28.1%+25%
  3. Thickness11.6 mm vs 13.1 mm+13%

Why is 3210 better than 215 4G (2024)?

  1. Pixel density143 ppi vs 167 ppi+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Nokia 3210Nokia 3210≈ $753.6
Design
Weight—86 g
Thickness11.6 mm13.1 mm
Height127.3 mm122 mm
Width54.2 mm52 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
ColoursPeach, Black, Dark BlueScuba Blue, Y2K Gold, Grunge Black
Display
Screen size2.8″2.4″
PanelTFT LCDTFT
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density143 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio35.2%28.1%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process22 nm22 nm
CPU cores11
CPU frequency1 GHz1 GHz
Memory
RAM0.062 GB0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—2 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Battery
Battery capacity1,450 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFCNoNo
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SensorsNo—
Software
InterfaceSeries 30—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare