- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 210 4G 2026 vs 235 4G
Nokia 210 4G 2026 vs Nokia 235 4G
What 210 4G 2026 does better (2) and where 235 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display2.0
2.1Camera3.1
2.1Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
210 4G 2026235 4G
| 210 4G 2026 | 235 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 126.1 mm | 128.8 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 55.8 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 12.9 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 106 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 210 4G 2026 better than 235 4G?
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
- Weight93 g vs 106 g+14%
Why is 235 4G better than 210 4G 2026?
- Main camera0.3 MP vs 2 MP6.7×
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
- Thickness14 mm vs 12.9 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 106 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 12.9 mm |
| Height | 126.1 mm | 128.8 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 55.8 mm |
| Colours | Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T127 | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Nokia Series 30+ | Nokia Series 30+ |
| Platform | Other | Other |
