- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 105 4G 2023 vs 150 (2023)
Nokia 105 4G 2023 vs Nokia 150 (2023)
What 105 4G 2023 does better (2) and where 150 (2023) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display2.1
2.1Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 4G 2023150 (2023)
| 105 4G 2023 | 150 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 121.5 mm | 131 mm | −9.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50.6 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 15.2 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 106 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 4G 2023 better than 150 (2023)?
- Weight93 g vs 106 g+14%
- Thickness14.4 mm vs 15.2 mm+6%
Why is 150 (2023) better than 105 4G 2023?
- Pixel density111 ppi vs 167 ppi+50%
- Screen size1.8″ vs 2.4″+33%
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 240 px2×
- Screen-to-body ratio16.6% vs 26.9%+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 106 g |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 15.2 mm |
| Height | 121.5 mm | 131 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50.6 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Charcoal, Ocean Blue | Black, Cyan, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 16.6% | 26.9% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | microUSB 1.1 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
| Software | ||
| Interface | Series 30 | Series 30 |
