- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 105 4G 2023 vs T909c
Nokia 105 4G 2023 vs Tel.Me. T909c
What 105 4G 2023 does better (4) and where T909c wins (1) — every spec side by side.
2.0Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 4G 2023T909c
| 105 4G 2023 | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 121.5 mm | 129 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 44 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 18 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 80 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 4G 2023 better than T909c?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 600 mAh2.4×
- Memory card slotYes · T909c: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
- Thickness14.4 mm vs 18 mm+25%
Why is T909c better than 105 4G 2023?
- Weight93 g vs 80 g+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 121.5 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | Charcoal, Ocean Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | — |
| Panel | LCD | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | — |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 16.6% | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Software | ||
| Interface | Series 30 | — |
