- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Razr 70 vs 2360 Flip
Motorola Razr 70 vs Nokia 2360 Flip
What Razr 70 does better (13) and where 2360 Flip wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 702360 Flip
| Razr 70 | 2360 Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.3 mm | 111.9 mm | +59.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 55.6 mm | +18.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 19 mm | −11.7 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 121 g | +67 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 70 better than 2360 Flip?
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 1,450 mAh3.3×
- RAM8 GB vs 0.004 GB2,048×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 143 ppi2.9×
- Screen size6.9″ vs 2.8″2.5×
- OLED panelYes · 2360 Flip: No
- NFCYes · 2360 Flip: No
- Stereo speakersYes · 2360 Flip: No
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 19 mm2.6×
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 240 px4.5×
- Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 39%2.2×
- eSIMYes · 2360 Flip: No
Why is 2360 Flip better than Razr 70?
- Weight188 g vs 121 g+55%
- Memory card slotNo · Razr 70: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Razr 70: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 121 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 19 mm |
| Height | 171.3 mm | 111.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 55.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Hematite, Sporting Green, Bright White, Rose | Burgundy Red, Charcoal, Teal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | TFT |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,522 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 39% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7450X | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 756,392 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,250 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,061 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 0.004 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 13 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 60 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
