- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Razr 60 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold4
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
What Razr 60 Ultra does better (20) and where Galaxy Z Fold4 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display3.6
8.4Performance4.4
6.6Camera7.6
8.4Battery4.3
8.4Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 60 UltraGalaxy Z Fold4
| Razr 60 Ultra | Galaxy Z Fold4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 155.1 mm | +16.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 130.1 mm | −56.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.3 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 263 g | −64 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Fold4?
- Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
- AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 964,530+90%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,200 nits3.8×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 3,981+71%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,938 vs 2,7122.2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+7%
- Measured brightness1,489 nits vs 1,000 nits+49%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 4 MP12.5×
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+35%
- Weight199 g vs 263 g+32%
Why is Galaxy Z Fold4 better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 60 Ultra: Yes
- Optical zoom2× vs 3×+50%
- Screen size7″ vs 7.6″+9%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,812 px+48%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.3 mm+14%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 90.9%+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 263 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.3 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 155.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 130.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IPX8 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | Schott Ultra Thin Glas |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Graygreen, Phantom Black, Beige, Burgundy |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 7.6″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,812 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,176 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 373 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,489 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 90.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,831,189 | 964,530 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,796 | 3,981 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,938 | 2,712 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 4 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.2 h | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -28.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.3 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 12L |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | One UI 6.1.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | D | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
9.16.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 2
9.18.7
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
9.15.0
vs
Xiaomi Mix FlipvsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra
8.19.1
vs
Honor Magic V Flip 2vsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra
8.99.1
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsHuawei Mate X5
9.18.6