How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Mate X5 vs Razr 60 Ultra

Huawei Mate X5 vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

What Mate X5 does better (11) and where Razr 60 Ultra wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Huawei Mate X5
Huawei · 2023Mate X5
8.6Score
11 advantages
vs
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra
9.1Score
12 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
8.7Display9.6
8.2Camera6.6
8.7Battery8.4
4.7Features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mate X5Razr 60 Ultra
141.5 × 156.95.374 × 171.57.2
Mate X5Razr 60 UltraDifference
Height156.9 mm171.5 mm−14.6 mm
Width141.5 mm74 mm+67.5 mm
Thickness5.3 mm7.2 mm−1.9 mm
Weight243 g199 g+44 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mate X5 better than Razr 60 Ultra?

  1. Optical zoom5× vs 2×2.5×
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · Razr 60 Ultra: No
  3. Battery capacity5,060 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+8%
  4. Memory card slotYes · Razr 60 Ultra: No
  5. Screen size7.8″ vs 7″+12%
  6. Resolution (width)2,224 px vs 1,224 px+82%
  7. Wireless charging power50 W vs 30 W+67%
  8. USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
  9. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  10. Thickness5.3 mm vs 7.2 mm+36%
  11. Screen-to-body ratio88.9% vs 84.1%+6%

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Mate X5?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
  2. CPU frequency2.62 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+65%
  3. Selfie camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
  4. Process7 nm vs 3 nm2.3×
  5. Wired charging66 W vs 68 W+3%
  6. Weight243 g vs 199 g+22%
  7. Max video4K vs 8K
  8. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  9. eSIMNo · Mate X5: Yes
  10. Pixel density426 ppi vs 464 ppi+9%
  11. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
  12. Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight243 g199 g
Thickness5.3 mm7.2 mm
Height156.9 mm171.5 mm
Width141.5 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassSilicone polymer
Ingress protection—IP48
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protectionKunlun Glass (cover display only)Gorilla Glass-Keramik
ColoursBlack, White, Purple, Dark Green, GoldPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret
StylusYes—
Display
Screen size7.8″7″
PanelFoldable OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)2,224 px1,224 px
Resolution (height)2,496 px2,912 px
Pixel density426 ppi464 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,489 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.9%84.1%
HDR—Yes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetKirin 9000SQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerKirinQualcomm
Process7 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.62 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUMaleoon 910 MP4Adreno 830
AnTuTu score—1,831,189
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,796
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,938
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size—1/1.56"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom5×2×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera8 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,060 mAh4,700 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—15.2 h
Wired charging66 W68 W
Charged in 30 min—78%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W30 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C
USB version3.12
Video outputYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeterFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchHarmonyOS 4.0 (China)Android 15
PlatformHarmonyOSAndroid
InterfaceEMUI (Europe)Hello UI
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—49 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—D
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare