- dotrising.com
- Compare
- MM835 4G vs Phantom V Flip2
Maxcom MM835 4G vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2
What MM835 4G does better (3) and where Phantom V Flip2 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Camera5.2
Why is MM835 4G better than Phantom V Flip2?
- Weight100 g vs 196 g+96%
- Memory card slotYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- Dual SIMYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than MM835 4G?
- Battery capacity1,400 mAh vs 4,720 mAh3.4×
- Main camera0.3 MP vs 50 MP166.7×
- OLED panelNo · MM835 4G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · MM835 4G: Yes
- 5GNo · MM835 4G: Yes
- Screen size3.5″ vs 6.9″+97%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · MM835 4G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 100 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.6 mm |
| Height | — | 170.8 mm |
| Width | — | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Colours | — | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 3.5″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | — | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | — | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 893 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 85.9% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 775,306 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,544 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,247 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 50 MP |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,400 mAh | 4,720 mAh |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | — | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 14 |
| Platform | — | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
6.45.7
vs
nubia Flip 2vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
5.25.7
vs
nubia FlipvsTecno Phantom V Flip2
4.85.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
5.55.7
vs
Motorola Razr 40 UltravsTecno Phantom V Flip2
5.05.7
vs
Motorola Razr 40vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
4.75.7