How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. MM835 4G vs 2360 Flip

Maxcom MM835 4G vs Nokia 2360 Flip

What MM835 4G does better (3) and where 2360 Flip wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Maxcom MM835 4G
Maxcom · 2025MM835 4G
3 advantages≈ $70
vs
Nokia 2360 Flip
Nokia · 20262360 Flip
2 advantages

Why is MM835 4G better than 2360 Flip?

  1. Screen size3.5″ vs 2.8″+25%
  2. Weight100 g vs 121 g+21%
  3. Dual SIMYes · 2360 Flip: No

Why is 2360 Flip better than MM835 4G?

  1. Battery capacity1,400 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+4%
  2. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MM835 4G: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight100 g121 g
Thickness—19 mm
Height—111.9 mm
Width—55.6 mm
Colours—Burgundy Red, Charcoal, Teal
Display
Screen size3.5″2.8″
Panel—TFT
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)—240 px
Resolution (height)—320 px
Pixel density—143 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—39%
FoldableYesYes
Memory
RAM—0.004 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Battery
Battery capacity1,400 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Connectivity
5GNo—
eSIM—No
Dual SIMYesNo
NFC—No
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare