- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Blaze Pro 5G vs Galaxy A24 4G
Lava Blaze Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What Blaze Pro 5G does better (6) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.0
4.6Camera7.8
6.0Battery5.3
5.0Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blaze Pro 5GGalaxy A24 4G
| Blaze Pro 5G | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.7 mm | 162.1 mm | +6.6 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 77.6 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 195 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blaze Pro 5G better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- 5GYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
- Charged in 30 min52% vs 46%+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.4% vs 82.4%+2%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Blaze Pro 5G?
- OLED panelNo · Blaze Pro 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Blaze Pro 5G: Yes
- NFCNo · Blaze Pro 5G: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Blaze Pro 5G: Yes
- Weight203 g vs 195 g+4%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Thickness9 mm vs 8.3 mm+8%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 168.7 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Starry Night, Radiant Pearl | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0