dotrising.com
Compare
nova Flip S vs Razr 60 Ultra

Huawei nova Flip S vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

What nova Flip S does better (3) and where Razr 60 Ultra wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025nova Flip S

6.7Score

3 advantages≈ $440

Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra

9.1Score

15 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

6.9Display9.6

6.0Camera6.6

5.6Battery8.4

4.7Features8.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

nova Flip SRazr 60 Ultra

	nova Flip S	Razr 60 Ultra	Difference
Height	169.8 mm	171.5 mm	−1.7 mm
Width	75.4 mm	74 mm	+1.4 mm
Thickness	6.9 mm	7.2 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	195 g	199 g	−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is nova Flip S better than Razr 60 Ultra?

Weight195 g vs 199 g+2%
Thickness6.9 mm vs 7.2 mm+4%
Screen-to-body ratio87% vs 84.1%+3%

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than nova Flip S?

Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Wireless chargingNo · nova Flip S: Yes
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Battery capacity4,400 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+7%
Wired charging66 W vs 68 W+3%
Max video4K vs 8K
eSIMNo · nova Flip S: Yes
Pixel density421 ppi vs 464 ppi+10%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Resolution (width)1,136 px vs 1,224 px+8%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei nova Flip S≈ $4406.7	Motorola Razr 60 Ultra≈ $5409.1
Design
Weight	195 g	199 g
Thickness	6.9 mm	7.2 mm
Height	169.8 mm	171.5 mm
Width	75.4 mm	74 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	—	IP48
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Gorilla Glass-Keramik
Colours	Green, Pink, White, Black, Nova Black, Blue	Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret
Display
Screen size	6.9″	7″
Panel	Foldable LTPO OLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,136 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,690 px	2,912 px
Pixel density	421 ppi	464 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	—	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,489 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	87%	84.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin 8030	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	—	4.32 GHz
GPU	—	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	—	1,831,189
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,796
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	5,938
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Optical zoom	—	2×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,400 mAh	4,700 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	15.2 h
Wired charging	66 W	68 W
Charged in 30 min	75%	78%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	30 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 5.1	Android 15
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	Hello UI
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	49 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	D