- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate Xs 2 vs Phantom V Flip2
Huawei Mate Xs 2 vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2
What Mate Xs 2 does better (17) and where Phantom V Flip2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display6.0
2.8Performance2.5
5.4Camera5.2
6.1Battery6.2
3.8Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate Xs 2Phantom V Flip2
| Mate Xs 2 | Phantom V Flip2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156.5 mm | 170.8 mm | −14.3 mm |
| Width | 139.3 mm | 73.4 mm | +65.9 mm |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm | 7.6 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Weight | 255 g | 196 g | +59 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate Xs 2 better than Phantom V Flip2?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,131 vs 2,544+23%
- Resolution (width)2,200 px vs 1,080 px2×
- Memory card slotYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- Dual SIMYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- Screen size7.8″ vs 6.9″+13%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+9%
- Pixel density424 ppi vs 413 ppi+3%
Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than Mate Xs 2?
- AnTuTu score641,608 vs 775,306+21%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate Xs 2: Yes
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 4,720 mAh+3%
- Selfie camera11 MP vs 32 MP3×
- Wired charging66 W vs 70 W+6%
- Weight255 g vs 196 g+30%
- Measured brightness725 nits vs 893 nits+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 255 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 156.5 mm | 170.8 mm |
| Width | 139.3 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Colours | Black, White, Purple | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 424 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 725 nits | 893 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 85.9% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 641,608 | 775,306 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,131 | 2,544 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,247 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 11 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,720 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.8 LUFS | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | EMUI 12 | Android 14 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
6.45.7
vs
nubia Flip 2vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
5.25.7
vs
nubia FlipvsTecno Phantom V Flip2
4.85.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
5.55.7
vs
Motorola Razr 40 UltravsTecno Phantom V Flip2
5.05.7
vs
Motorola Razr 40vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
4.75.7


