dotrising.com
Compare
Mate 70 Pro+ vs Edge 50 Ultra

Huawei Mate 70 Pro+ vs Motorola Edge 50 Ultra

What Mate 70 Pro+ does better (7) and where Edge 50 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2024Mate 70 Pro+

9.4Score

7 advantages≈ $1,200

Higher score

Motorola · 2024Edge 50 Ultra

9.2Score

9 advantages≈ $1,400

9.0Display9.5

7.9Performance8.2

9.3Camera9.4

9.6Battery6.8

9.3Features8.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Mate 70 Pro+Edge 50 Ultra

	Mate 70 Pro+	Edge 50 Ultra	Difference
Height	164.6 mm	161.1 mm	+3.5 mm
Width	79.5 mm	72.4 mm	+7.1 mm
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.6 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	226 g	197 g	+29 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mate 70 Pro+ better than Edge 50 Ultra?

Battery capacity5,700 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+27%
Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
Wireless charging power80 W vs 50 W+60%
Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.6+14%
Resolution (width)1,316 px vs 1,220 px+8%
Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.6 mm+4%

Why is Edge 50 Ultra better than Mate 70 Pro+?

Wired charging100 W vs 125 W+25%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
eSIMNo · Mate 70 Pro+: Yes
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz+20%
Weight226 g vs 197 g+15%
Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 92.1%+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei Mate 70 Pro+≈ $1,2009.4	Motorola Edge 50 Ultra≈ $1,4009.2
Design
Weight	226 g	197 g
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.6 mm
Height	164.6 mm	161.1 mm
Width	79.5 mm	72.4 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Huawei Kunlun Glass 2	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Colours	Black, Gray, White, Green	Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.7″
Panel	LTPO OLED	P-OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,316 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,832 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	453 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,500 nits	2,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,473 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.7%	92.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin 9020	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 920	Adreno 735
AnTuTu score	1,504,969	1,485,409
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	5,138	5,051
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,258
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.4	f/1.6
Main sensor size	—	1/1.3"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.5×	3×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	13 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,700 mAh	4,500 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	12.9 h
Wired charging	100 W	125 W
Charged in 30 min	—	100%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	80 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2
USB version	3.1	3.1
Video output	Yes	Yes
Ultra Wideband	—	Yes
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Infrared port	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Yes	Under display
3D face unlock	Yes	—
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Face ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.3	Android 14
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	Hello UI
Major OS updates promised	—	3