dotrising.com
Compare
Edge 50 Ultra vs iQOO Neo9 Pro

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro

What Edge 50 Ultra does better (14) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Edge 50 Ultra

9.2Score

14 advantages≈ $1,400

Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro

9.2Score

10 advantages

Higher score

9.5Display9.4

8.2Performance8.6

9.4Camera8.9

6.8Battery8.6

8.5Features7.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 50 UltraiQOO Neo9 Pro

	Edge 50 Ultra	iQOO Neo9 Pro	Difference
Height	161.1 mm	163.5 mm	−2.4 mm
Width	72.4 mm	75.7 mm	−3.3 mm
Thickness	8.6 mm	8 mm	+0.6 mm
Weight	197 g	190 g	+7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 50 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
Wired charging125 W vs 120 W+4%
4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
eSIMYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than Edge 50 Ultra?

AnTuTu score1,485,409 vs 2,386,903+61%
Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+15%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,051 vs 5,445+8%
Max video4K vs 8K
Peak brightness2,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+20%
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
Weight197 g vs 190 g+4%
Charged in 30 min100% vs 136%+36%
Thickness8.6 mm vs 8 mm+7%
Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,260 px+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Edge 50 Ultra≈ $1,4009.2	Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro9.2
Design
Weight	197 g	190 g
Thickness	8.6 mm	8 mm
Height	161.1 mm	163.5 mm
Width	72.4 mm	75.7 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	Silicone polymer	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus	Schott Xensation Up
Colours	Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz	Fiery Red, Conqueror Black
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	P-OLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,220 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	2,712 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	446 ppi	453 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,500 nits	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,473 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	92.1%	89.7%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	1,485,409	2,386,903
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	5,051	5,445
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,258	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.6	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.3"	1/1.49"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,500 mAh	5,160 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	12.9 h	—
Wired charging	125 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	100%	136%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	50 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.1	2
Video output	Yes	—
Ultra Wideband	Yes	—
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.4 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	Funtouch 14
Major OS updates promised	3	—