- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate 50 vs X80 Lite
Huawei Mate 50 vs Vivo X80 Lite
What Mate 50 does better (17) and where X80 Lite wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 50X80 Lite
| Mate 50 | X80 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 159.2 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 74.2 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 186 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 50 better than X80 Lite?
- Wired charging66 W vs 44 W+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · X80 Lite: No
- Wireless chargingYes · X80 Lite: No
- Stereo speakersYes · X80 Lite: No
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Pixel density442 ppi vs 409 ppi+8%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+4%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is X80 Lite better than Mate 50?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate 50: Yes
- 5GNo · Mate 50: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight202 g vs 186 g+9%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.8 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 159.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Purple, Orange | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,404 px |
| Pixel density | 442 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 781 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 84.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 461,428 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,023 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,460 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 61% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | EMUI 13 (International) | Android 12 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 12 |
