- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate 50 vs Reno9 Pro+
Huawei Mate 50 vs OPPO Reno9 Pro+
What Mate 50 does better (10) and where Reno9 Pro+ wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display7.6
9.0Camera8.9
6.9Battery6.4
7.4Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 50Reno9 Pro+
| Mate 50 | Reno9 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 161.5 mm | = |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 73.6 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 202 g | 192 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 50 better than Reno9 Pro+?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Reno9 Pro+: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Reno9 Pro+: No
- Memory card slotYes · Reno9 Pro+: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Reno9 Pro+: No
- Pixel density442 ppi vs 394 ppi+12%
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 3 GHz+6%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.8+29%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Why is Reno9 Pro+ better than Mate 50?
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate 50: Yes
- 5GNo · Mate 50: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity4,460 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+5%
- Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight202 g vs 192 g+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.6% vs 90.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 161.5 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Purple, Orange | Black, Gold, Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 442 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 950 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 90.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,460 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 135% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | EMUI 13 (International) | Android 13 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 13 |
