- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate 50 vs Pova 4 Pro
Huawei Mate 50 vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What Mate 50 does better (21) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display6.3
9.0Camera4.6
6.9Battery8.3
7.4Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 50Pova 4 Pro
| Mate 50 | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 164.8 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 211 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 50 better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+45%
- Memory card slotYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Pixel density442 ppi vs 403 ppi+10%
- Weight202 g vs 211 g+4%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than Mate 50?
- Battery capacity4,460 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+35%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Mate 50: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Purple, Orange | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 442 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,460 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 62% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | EMUI 13 (International) | Android 12 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 8.6 |
