- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 70 vs Galaxy A24 4G
Huawei Enjoy 70 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What Enjoy 70 does better (4) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display7.0
4.6Camera7.8
7.4Battery5.3
3.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 70Galaxy A24 4G
| Enjoy 70 | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.3 mm | 162.1 mm | +6.2 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 77.6 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 195 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 70 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 82.4%+2%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Enjoy 70?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · Enjoy 70: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Enjoy 70: Yes
- NFCNo · Enjoy 70: Yes
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 396 ppi+52%
- Wired charging22 W vs 25 W+11%
- Process14 nm vs 6 nm2.3×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Enjoy 70: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Enjoy 70: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Weight207 g vs 195 g+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 168.3 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, White, Green | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 710A | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.0 | Android 13 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0


