- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Cyber 16 Pro vs Galaxy A17 4G
Hotwav Cyber 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
What Cyber 16 Pro does better (7) and where Galaxy A17 4G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Display7.0
7.0Camera7.8
Why is Cyber 16 Pro better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- RAM24 GB vs 8 GB3×
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity6,280 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+26%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 385 ppi+4%
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than Cyber 16 Pro?
- OLED panelNo · Cyber 16 Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Cyber 16 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Cyber 16 Pro: Yes
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 190 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.5 mm |
| Height | — | 164.4 mm |
| Width | — | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black | Black, Gray, Light blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | — | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Helio G100 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 526,972 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,052 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,280 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.37 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 52 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsSamsung Galaxy A55
7.08.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G
7.07.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsSamsung Galaxy A17
7.07.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsSamsung Galaxy A35
7.07.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsInfinix Hot 60 Pro+
7.07.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsXiaomi Redmi 15C
7.06.9