- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Play7T vs Galaxy A24 4G
Honor Play7T vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What Play7T does better (5) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Display7.0
4.1Camera7.8
7.4Battery5.3
5.0Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play7TGalaxy A24 4G
| Play7T | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.5 mm | 162.1 mm | +5.4 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 77.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.3 mm | = |
| Weight | 196 g | 195 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play7T better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 5GYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.1% vs 82.4%+3%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Play7T?
- OLED panelNo · Play7T: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Play7T: Yes
- NFCNo · Play7T: Yes
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 396 ppi+52%
- Wired charging22 W vs 25 W+11%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Memory card slotNo · Play7T: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Play7T: Yes
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 167.5 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6.1 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0


