- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Play6T Pro vs Camon 19 Pro
Honor Play6T Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
What Play6T Pro does better (7) and where Camon 19 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Display6.1
3.9Camera8.2
3.9Battery6.0
5.0Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play6T ProCamon 19 Pro
| Play6T Pro | Camon 19 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 166.8 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.6 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 204 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play6T Pro better than Camon 19 Pro?
- 5GYes · Camon 19 Pro: No
- Wired charging44 W vs 33 W+33%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+17%
- Weight175 g vs 204 g+17%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.6 mm+15%
Why is Camon 19 Pro better than Play6T Pro?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Play6T Pro: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Play6T Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Play6T Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 166.8 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Gold | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 480 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 479 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 88.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 348,546 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,734 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 326 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 47% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 5.0 | HIOS 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Tecno Camon 20 ProvsTecno Camon 19 Pro
6.66.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A23 5GvsTecno Camon 19 Pro
6.66.4
vs
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5GvsTecno Camon 19 Pro
7.96.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 ProvsTecno Camon 19 Pro
6.36.4
vs
Infinix Note 12 G96vsTecno Camon 19 Pro
6.36.4
vs
Tecno Camon 19 ProvsInfinix Note 12 (2023)
6.46.4