- dotrising.com
- Compare
- CL 8000 vs 215 4G (2026)
Geemarc CL 8000 vs Nokia 215 4G (2026)
What CL 8000 does better (0) and where 215 4G (2026) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
CL 8000215 4G (2026)
| CL 8000 | 215 4G (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 140 mm | 128.8 mm | +11.2 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 55 mm | = |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 12.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 105 g | 104 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CL 8000 better than 215 4G (2026)?
CL 8000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 215 4G (2026) better than CL 8000?
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+21%
- Dual SIMNo · CL 8000: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · CL 8000: Yes
- Thickness14 mm vs 12.8 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 105 g | 104 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 12.8 mm |
| Height | 140 mm | 128.8 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 55 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 34.3% |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.062 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Selfie camera | — | 0.3 MP |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
