How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 215 4G (2026) vs Neo Mini

Nokia 215 4G (2026) vs Olympia Neo Mini

What 215 4G (2026) does better (1) and where Neo Mini wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 215 4G (2026)
Nokia · 2026215 4G (2026)
1 advantage
vs
Olympia Neo Mini
Olympia · 2026Neo Mini
4.0Score
4 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

215 4G (2026)Neo Mini
55 × 128.812.874 × 148
215 4G (2026)Neo MiniDifference
Height128.8 mm148 mm−19.2 mm
Width55 mm74 mm−19 mm
Weight104 g124 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 215 4G (2026) better than Neo Mini?

  1. Weight104 g vs 124 g+19%

Why is Neo Mini better than 215 4G (2026)?

  1. RAM0.062 GB vs 3 GB48×
  2. Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 2,800 mAh+93%
  3. Screen size2.8″ vs 5″+79%
  4. Selfie camera0.3 MP vs 2 MP6.7×
Specifications

Side by side

Olympia Neo MiniOlympia Neo Mini≈ $1104.0
Design
Weight104 g124 g
Thickness12.8 mm—
Height128.8 mm148 mm
Width55 mm74 mm
ColoursBlack, RedBlack
Display
Screen size2.8″5″
PanelTFT LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px—
Resolution (height)320 px—
Pixel density143 ppi—
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Screen-to-body ratio34.3%—
Memory
RAM0.062 GB3 GB
Storage (max)—32 GB
Storage (base)—32 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—5 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Selfie camera0.3 MP2 MP
Battery
Battery capacity1,450 mAh2,800 mAh
Battery typeLi-Ion—
Connectivity
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth5—
NFCNoNo
USBUSB Type-C—
Features
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5 mm headphone jackYes—
SensorsNo—
Software
OS at launch—Android 15
Platform—Android
EU label
Energy class—G
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare