- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C200 Comfort 4G vs 105 4G 2023
Funker C200 Comfort 4G vs Nokia 105 4G 2023
What C200 Comfort 4G does better (1) and where 105 4G 2023 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
C200 Comfort 4G105 4G 2023
| C200 Comfort 4G | 105 4G 2023 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 121.5 mm | −16.5 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 14.4 mm | +6.9 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 93 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C200 Comfort 4G better than 105 4G 2023?
- Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
Why is 105 4G 2023 better than C200 Comfort 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight128 g vs 93 g+38%
- Dual SIMNo · C200 Comfort 4G: Yes
- Thickness21.3 mm vs 14.4 mm+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 128 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Charcoal, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 160 px |
| Pixel density | — | 111 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 16.6% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Software | ||
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
