How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. E246SC vs 105 4G 2023

Energizer E246SC vs Nokia 105 4G 2023

What E246SC does better (5) and where 105 4G 2023 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Energizer E246SC
Energizer · 2024E246SC
5 advantages≈ $55
vs
Nokia 105 4G 2023
Nokia · 2023105 4G 2023
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ $50
Higher score
2.1Display2.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

E246SC105 4G 2023
70 × 862150 × 121.514.4
E246SC105 4G 2023Difference
Height86 mm121.5 mm−35.5 mm
Width70 mm50 mm+20 mm
Thickness21 mm14.4 mm+6.6 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is E246SC better than 105 4G 2023?

  1. Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+38%
  2. Pixel density167 ppi vs 111 ppi+50%
  3. Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
  4. Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×
  5. Screen-to-body ratio29.6% vs 16.6%+78%

Why is 105 4G 2023 better than E246SC?

  1. Thickness21 mm vs 14.4 mm+46%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight—93 g
Thickness21 mm14.4 mm
Height86 mm121.5 mm
Width70 mm50 mm
ColoursGrayCharcoal, Ocean Blue
Display
Screen size2.4″1.8″
PanelTN TFTLCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px120 px
Resolution (height)320 px160 px
Pixel density167 ppi111 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Screen-to-body ratio29.6%16.6%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107—
Chip makerUnisoc—
Process22 nm—
CPU cores1—
CPU frequency1 GHz—
Memory
RAM0.047 GB—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
4K selfie videoNo—
Battery
Battery capacity2,000 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-Ion—
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFCNo—
USBUSB Type-C 2.0—
USB version22
Features
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5 mm headphone jackYes—
SensorsNo—
Software
OS at launchProprietary OS—
PlatformOther—
Interface—Series 30
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare