- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 1880 vs 105 4G 2023
Doro 1880 vs Nokia 105 4G 2023
What 1880 does better (5) and where 105 4G 2023 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display2.0
2.0Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
1880105 4G 2023
| 1880 | 105 4G 2023 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 128 mm | 121.5 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Width | 67 mm | 50 mm | +17 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 14.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 114 g | 93 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 1880 better than 105 4G 2023?
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 111 ppi+50%
- Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×
- Screen-to-body ratio20.9% vs 16.6%+26%
- Thickness13 mm vs 14.4 mm+11%
Why is 105 4G 2023 better than 1880?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight114 g vs 93 g+23%
- Dual SIMNo · 1880: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 114 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 128 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 67 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black, Red | Charcoal, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 20.9% | 16.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Mocor OS | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
