dotrising.com
Compare
KingKong Power vs Galaxy M34 5G

Cubot KingKong Power vs Samsung Galaxy M34 5G

What KingKong Power does better (6) and where Galaxy M34 5G wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2023KingKong Power

7.2Score

6 advantages≈ $230

Samsung · 2023Galaxy M34 5G

7.9Score

11 advantages≈ $210

Higher score

4.3Display7.5

5.2Camera8.0

8.6Battery7.5

7.3Features6.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

KingKong PowerGalaxy M34 5G

	KingKong Power	Galaxy M34 5G	Difference
Height	169.9 mm	161.7 mm	+8.2 mm
Width	80.2 mm	77.2 mm	+3 mm
Thickness	20 mm	8.8 mm	+11.2 mm
Weight	382 g	208 g	+174 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KingKong Power better than Galaxy M34 5G?

Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+77%
Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Pixel density405 ppi vs 396 ppi+2%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%

Why is Galaxy M34 5G better than KingKong Power?

Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
OLED panelNo · KingKong Power: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong Power: Yes
Weight382 g vs 208 g+84%
Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
Thickness20 mm vs 8.8 mm2.3×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong Power: Yes
CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Bluetooth4.2 vs 5.3+26%
Screen-to-body ratio74.9% vs 83.1%+11%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot KingKong Power≈ $2307.2	Samsung Galaxy M34 5G≈ $2107.9
Design
Weight	382 g	208 g
Thickness	20 mm	8.8 mm
Height	169.9 mm	161.7 mm
Width	80.2 mm	77.2 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP67
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx7
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black	Midnight Blue, Prism Silver, Waterfall Blue
Display
Screen size	6.5″	6.5″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	405 ppi	396 ppi
Refresh rate	60 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	885 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	74.9%	83.1%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek MT8788V/WA	Exynos 1280
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	—	5 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	—	Mali-G68
AnTuTu score	—	603,449
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	2,104
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	48 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	—	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	13 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,600 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Wired charging	33 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	45%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	4.2	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.89 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 8

Related comparisons

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProvsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G 8.07.9

Google Pixel 7avsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G 8.07.9

Samsung Galaxy M35vsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G 8.37.9

Samsung Galaxy M15vsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G 7.17.9

Samsung Galaxy M55vsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G 8.57.9

Samsung Galaxy M34 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M33 7.96.7