- dotrising.com
- Compare
- S22 Flip vs Razr 40 Ultra
Caterpillar S22 Flip vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
What S22 Flip does better (2) and where Razr 40 Ultra wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Display6.5
2.2Camera5.4
2.6Battery3.1
2.8Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
S22 FlipRazr 40 Ultra
| S22 Flip | Razr 40 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 119.4 mm | 170.8 mm | −51.4 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 74 mm | −13 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 7 mm | +16 mm |
| Weight | 224 g | 184 g | +40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S22 Flip better than Razr 40 Ultra?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Memory card slotYes · Razr 40 Ultra: No
Why is Razr 40 Ultra better than S22 Flip?
- RAM2 GB vs 12 GB6×
- Main camera5 MP vs 12 MP2.4×
- Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 3,800 mAh+90%
- Storage (max)16 GB vs 512 GB32×
- Screen size2.8″ vs 6.9″2.5×
- CPU frequency1.3 GHz vs 3.19 GHz2.5×
- OLED panelNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- 5GNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- NFCNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- Thickness23 mm vs 7 mm3.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 224 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 7 mm |
| Height | 119.4 mm | 170.8 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5, Dinorex | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black | Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta, Peach Fuzz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | LCD | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 480 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 286 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,050 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 85.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.3 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 308 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 975,461 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,645 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 16 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 5 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.55" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 2 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | 3,800 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 5 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 13 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Razr 40vsCaterpillar S22 Flip
4.74.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5vsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
5.55.0
vs
Motorola Razr 40 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
5.06.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
9.15.0
vs
nubia FlipvsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
4.85.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4vsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
4.95.0

