- dotrising.com
- Compare
- S22 Flip vs Razr 40
Caterpillar S22 Flip vs Motorola Razr 40
What S22 Flip does better (2) and where Razr 40 wins (23) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
S22 FlipRazr 40
| S22 Flip | Razr 40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 119.4 mm | 170.8 mm | −51.4 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 74 mm | −13 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 7.4 mm | +15.6 mm |
| Weight | 224 g | 189 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S22 Flip better than Razr 40?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Memory card slotYes · Razr 40: No
Why is Razr 40 better than S22 Flip?
- Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh2.1×
- RAM2 GB vs 12 GB6×
- Main camera5 MP vs 64 MP12.8×
- Storage (max)16 GB vs 256 GB16×
- Screen size2.8″ vs 6.9″2.5×
- OLED panelNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- 5GNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- NFCNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- CPU frequency1.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+85%
- Thickness23 mm vs 7.4 mm3.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 224 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 119.4 mm | 170.8 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5, Dinorex | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black | Sage Green, Vanilla Cream, Summer Lilac, Grape Compote, Cherry Blossom |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | LCD | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 480 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 286 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,064 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 85.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 308 | Adreno 644 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 492,343 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,873 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 5 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 2 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 5 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 13 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
