- dotrising.com
- Compare
- BL8800 Pro vs Narzo 50 Pro
Blackview BL8800 Pro vs Realme Narzo 50 Pro
What BL8800 Pro does better (4) and where Narzo 50 Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display7.2
5.8Camera6.0
8.5Battery6.0
7.6Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
BL8800 ProNarzo 50 Pro
| BL8800 Pro | Narzo 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 176.2 mm | 160.2 mm | +16 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 73.3 mm | +10.2 mm |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8 mm | +9.7 mm |
| Weight | 367 g | 181 g | +186 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BL8800 Pro better than Narzo 50 Pro?
- Battery capacity8,380 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+68%
- NFCYes · Narzo 50 Pro: No
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.4″+3%
Why is Narzo 50 Pro better than BL8800 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Weight367 g vs 181 g2×
- OLED panelNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Thickness17.7 mm vs 8 mm2.2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 411 ppi+2%
- Charged in 30 min31% vs 48%+55%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio70.9% vs 84.2%+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 367 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 176.2 mm | 160.2 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 73.3 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.9% | 84.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek Dimensity 920 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,380 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 31% | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | realme UI 3 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
7.47.2
vs
Vivo V23 5GvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
7.47.2
vs
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5GvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
7.27.2
vs
Realme Narzo 50 ProvsInfinix Zero 5G 2023
7.27.2
vs
Realme Narzo 70 ProvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
8.17.2
vs
Realme Narzo 60 ProvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
8.57.2


