- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9F Floating vs 105 4G 2023
AGM M9F Floating vs Nokia 105 4G 2023
What M9F Floating does better (2) and where 105 4G 2023 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9F Floating105 4G 2023
| M9F Floating | 105 4G 2023 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 121.5 mm | +19.8 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm | +9 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 14.4 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 126 g | 93 g | +33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9F Floating better than 105 4G 2023?
- Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×
Why is 105 4G 2023 better than M9F Floating?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight126 g vs 93 g+35%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 14.4 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 126 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Yellow, Black | Charcoal, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | Farb-Display | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | — | 111 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 16.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Software | ||
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
